ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Three years of using robots in an artificial intelligence course: lessons learned
Full text PdfPdf (284 KB)
Source Journal on Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC) archive
Volume 4 ,  Issue 3  (September 2004) table of contents
Special issue on robotics in undergraduate education. Part 2
Article No. 2  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISSN:1531-4278
Author
Amruth N. Kumar  Ramapo College of New Jersey
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22,   Downloads (12 Months): 171,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1083310.1083311
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We have been using robots in our artificial intelligence course since fall 2000. We have been using the robots for open-laboratory projects. The projects are designed to emphasize high-level knowledge-based AI algorithms. After three offerings of the course, we paused to analyze the collected data and to see if we could answer the following questions: (i) Are robot projects effective at helping students learn AI concepts? (ii) What advantages, if any, can be attributed to using robots for AI projects? (iii) What are the downsides of using robots for traditional projects in AI? In this article we discuss the results of our evaluation and list the lessons learned.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Brooks, R.A. 1986. A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE J. Robotics and Automation. 2, 1 (March 1986), 14-23.
 
3
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., And Duguid, S. 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18, 1 (1989), 32-42.
 
4
Dodds, Z., Santana, S., Erickson, B., Wnuk, K., Fisher, J., And Livianu, M. 2004. Teaching robot localization with the evolution ER1. In Accessible Hands-on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Education, AAAI Spring Symposium. Tech. Rep. SS-04-01. 18-23.
5
 
6
Fossum, T.V., Haller, S. M., Voyles, M. M., And Guttschow, G. L. 2001. A gender-based study of elementary school children working with Robolab. In AAAI Spring Symposium Workshop on Robotics in Education. Tech. Rep., Stanford University, March 2001.
 
7
Greenwald, L. And Artz, D. 2004. Teaching artificial intelligence with low-cost robots. In Accessible Hands-on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Education, AAAI Spring Symposium. Tech. Rep. SS-04-01, 35-40.
8
9
10
 
11
Kumar, A. 2001. Using robots in the undergraduate artificial intelligence course: An experience report. In Proceedings of the FIE 2001. Session T4D.
 
12
 
13
Mayer, G. R., Weinberg, J. B., And Yu, X. 2004. Teaching deliberative navigation using the LEGO RCX and standard LEGO components. In Accessible Hands-on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Education, AAAI Spring Symposium. Tech. Rep. SS-04-01. 30-34.
14
 
15
 
16
Sklar, E., Eguchi, A., And Johnson, J. 2002. Robocupjunior: Learning with educational robotics. In Proceedings of the 6th Robocup Symposium (2002).
17
 
18
Turner, C., Ford, K., Dobbs, S., Suri, N., And Hayes, P. 1996. Robots in the classroom. In Proceedings of the Ninth Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symposium (FLAIRS '96). Florida AI Research Society, 497-500.
 
19
Verner, I. M. And Ahlgren, D. J. 2004. Robot contests: Promoting experiential engineering education. In Accessible Hands-on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Education, AAAI Spring Symposium. Tech. Rep. SS-04-01. 141-145.

CITED BY  8