Exploring perceptual equivalence between real and simulated imagery

ABSTRACT

We conducted a new psychophysical experiment which judges the quality of computer graphics imagery with respect to the real scene it depicts. The experimental framework facilitates perceptual judgment of images against a real scene. Unlike previous work, which examined at primitive objects under basic illumination, this new experiment examines complex geometry illuminated using a calibrated light source. Here we present the design and results of the experiment. To ensure valid results, a commercial lighting booth containing rapid prototyped three dimensional objects serves as the real scene. For comparison, a series of representative images, of varying quality, were rendered using the physically based Radiance lighting simulation software. Result from these experiments show that higher parameter settings, which lead to longer processing times, do not necessarily lead to higher quality images.

REFERENCES

• 1: CIE. 1924. CIE Proceedings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• 2: CMB, 2005. The gti colormatcher series. http://www.gtilite.com/colormatcher-series.htm.
• 3: Coolican, H. 1999. Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology. Hodder and Stoughton, Oxford.
• 4: FDM, 2005. Slu product realization lab. http://parks.slu.edu.
• 5: Gilchrist, A., and Jacobsen, A. 1984. Perception of lightness and illumination in a world of one reflectance. Perception 13, 5--19.
• 6: Gilchrist, A. L. 1979. The perception of surface blacks and whites. Scientific American 240, 3 (Mar.), 88--97.
• 7: Gilchrist, A. 1996. Lightness, Brightness and Transparency. Hillsdale: Lawerence Erlibaum Associates.
• 8: Greg Ward Larson , Rob Shakespeare, Rendering with radiance: the art and science of lighting visualization, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1998
• 9: Mania, A., 2001. Fidelity metrics for virtual environment simulations based on human judgements of spatial memory awareness states, August.
• 10: Ann McNamara , Alan Chalmers , Tom Troscianko , Iain Gilchrist, Comparing Real & Synthetic Scenes using Human Judgements of Lightness, Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Techniques 2000, p.207-218, June 26-28, 2000
• 11: McNamara, A., 2000. Evaluating image quality metrics vs. human evaluation. ACM SIGGRAPH 2000 Sketches Program.
• 12: Gary W. Meyer , Holly E. Rushmeier , Michael F. Cohen , Donald P. Greenberg , Kenneth E. Torrance, An experimental evaluation of computer graphics imagery, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.5 n.1, p.30-50, Jan. 1986 [doi>10.1145/7529.7920]
• 13: Paul Rademacher , Jed Lengyel , Edward Cutrell , Turner Whitted, Measuring the Perception of Visual Realism in Images, Proceedings of the 12th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Techniques, p.235-248, June 25-27, 2001
• 14: Radiance, 2005. Radiance lighting simulation. http://radsite.lbl.gov.
• 15: Stanford, 2005. The stanford bunny. http://graphics.stanford.edu/data/3Dscanrep.
• 16: Travis, D. 1991. Effective Color Displays. Academic Press.
• 17: Martin Usoh , Kevin Arthur , Mary C. Whitton , Rui Bastos , Anthony Steed , Mel Slater , Frederick P. Brooks, Jr., Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments, Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.359-364, July 1999 [doi>10.1145/311535.311589]