GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games

ABSTRACT

Although player enjoyment is central to computer games, there is currently no accepted model of player enjoyment in games. There are many heuristics in the literature, based on elements such as the game interface, mechanics, gameplay, and narrative. However, there is a need to integrate these heuristics into a validated model that can be used to design, evaluate, and understand enjoyment in games. We have drawn together the various heuristics into a concise model of enjoyment in games that is structured by flow. Flow, a widely accepted model of enjoyment, includes eight elements that, we found, encompass the various heuristics from the literature. Our new model, GameFlow, consists of eight elements -- concentration, challenge, skills, control, clear goals, feedback, immersion, and social interaction. Each element includes a set of criteria for achieving enjoyment in games. An initial investigation and validation of the GameFlow model was carried out by conducting expert reviews of two real-time strategy games, one high-rating and one low-rating, using the GameFlow criteria. The result was a deeper understanding of enjoyment in real-time strategy games and the identification of the strengths and weaknesses of the GameFlow model as an evaluation tool. The GameFlow criteria were able to successfully distinguish between the high-rated and low-rated games and identify why one succeeded and the other failed. We concluded that the GameFlow model can be used in its current form to review games; further work will provide tools for designing and evaluating enjoyment in games.

REFERENCES

• 1: Adams, E. 2004. The designer's notebook: Bad game designer, no Twinkie! Gamasutra} (June 2004). http://www.gamasutra.com/features/20040611/adams_01.shtml. Online Feb. 1, 2005.
• 2: John M. Artz, Computers and the quality of life: assessing flow in information systems, ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, v.26 n.3, p.7-12, September 1996 [doi>10.1145/606032.606033]
• 3: Blizzard 2002. Warcraft 3. http://www.blizzard.com/war3/. Online Feb. 1, 2005.
• 4: Emily Brown , Paul Cairns, A grounded investigation of game immersion, CHI '04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria [doi>10.1145/985921.986048]
• 5: Church, D. 2002. Simulation, emulation, and the game design/development process. Presented at the Australian Game Developers Conference (Melbourne, Dec. 6-8, 2002).
• 6: Steve Cornett, The usability of massively multiplayer online roleplaying games: designing for new users, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.703-710, April 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria [doi>10.1145/985692.985781]
• 7: Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial, New York.
• 8: Denham, B. 2004. Toward an explication of media enjoyment: The synergy of social norms, viewing situations and program content. Communication Theory 14, 4 (2004), 370-387.
• 9: Heather Desurvire , Martin Caplan , Jozsef A. Toth, Using heuristics to evaluate the playability of games, CHI '04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria [doi>10.1145/985921.986102]
• 10: Federoff, M. 2002. Heuristics and usability guidelines for the creation and evaluation of fun in video games. Unpublished thesis, Indiana Univ., Bloomington. http://www.melissafederoff.com/thesis.html. Online Feb. 1, 2005.
• 11: Fullerton, T., Swain, C., and Hoffman, S. 2004. Improving player choices. Gamasutra (March 2004). http://www.gamasutra.com/features/20040310/fullerton_01.shtml. Online Feb. 1, 2005.
• 12: GameRankings. 2004. http://www.gamerankings.com/. Online Feb. 1, 2005.
• 13: Garneau, P. 2002. Emergence: Making games deeper. http://www.pagtech.com/ Articles/Emergence.html. Online July 24, 2003.
• 14: Gee, J. P. 2004. Learning by design: Games as learning machines. Gamasutra (March 2004). Online Feb. 1, 2005. http://www.gamasutra.com/gdc2004/features/20040324/gee_01.shtml.
• 15: Green, M., Brock, T., and Kaufman, G. 2004. Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory 14, 4 (2004), 311-327.
• 16: Morgan Jennings, Theory and models for creating engaging and immersive ecommerce Websites, Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research, p.77-85, April 2000, Chicago, Illinois, United States [doi>10.1145/333334.333358]
• 17: Johnson, D. and Wiles, J. 2003. Effective affective user interface design in games. Ergonomics 46, 13/14 (2003), 1332-1345.
• 18: Juul, J. 2004. Working with the player's repertoire. Int. J. Intelligent Games and Simulation 3, 1 (2004), 54-61.
• 19: Kane, B. 2003. Postcard from GDC 2003: 34 ways to put emotions into games. Gamasutra (March 2003). http://www.gamasutra.com/gdc2003/features/20030308/kane_emotion_01.htm. Online Feb. 1, 2005.
• 20: Lazzaro, N. 2004. Why we play games: Four keys to more emotion without story. http://www.xeodesign.com/whyweplaygames/xeodesign_whyweplaygames.pdf. Online Feb. 1, 2005.
• 21: Nicole Lazzaro , Kevin Keeker, What's my method?: a game show on games, CHI '04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, p.1093-1094, April 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria [doi>10.1145/985921.985922]
• 22: Nabi, R. and Krcmar, M. 2004. Conceptualising media enjoyment as attitude: implications for mass media effects research. Communication Theory 4, 14 (2004), 288-310.
• 23: Oliver, M. and Nabi, R. 2004. Exploring the concept of media enjoyment: An introduction to the special issue. Communication Theory 14, 4 (2004), 285-287.
• 24: Francois Pachet , Anna Rita Addessi, When children reflect on their own playing style: experiments with continuator and children, Computers in Entertainment (CIE), v.2 n.1, January 2004 [doi>10.1145/973801.973824]
• 25: Randy J. Pagulayan , Kevin Keeker , Dennis Wixon , Ramon L. Romero , Thomas Fuller, User-centered design in games, The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 2002
• 26: Raney, A. 2004. Expanding disposition theory: Reconsidering character liking, moral evaluations, and enjoyment. Communication Theory 14, 4 (2004), 348-369.
• 27: Sharafi, P., Hedman, L., and Montgomery, H. 2004. Using information technology: engagement modes, flow experience, and personality orientations.
• 28: Smith, H. 1999. The three goals of the game designer. Gamasutra (April 1999). http://www.gamasutra.com/features/19990409/enemies_02.htm. Online Feb. 1, 2005.
• 29: Smith, H. 2002. Systemic level design. In the Game Developers Conference (San Jose, CA, March 21-23, 2002).
• 30: Sony. 2003. Lords of EverQuest. http://lordsofeverquest.station.sony.com/. Online Feb. 1, 2005.
• 31: Sweetser, P. and Dennis, S. 2003. Facilitating learning in a real time strategy computer game. In Entertainment Computing: Technologies and Applications. R. Nakatsu and J. Hoshino (eds.). Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, 49-56.
• 32: Sweetser, P. and Johnson, D. 2004. Player-centred game environments: Assessing player opinions, experiences and issues. In Entertainment Computing - ICEC 2004: Third International Conference. LNCS 3166, Springer Verlag, New York, 321-332.
• 33: Penelope Sweetser , Daniel Johnson , Jane Sweetser , Janet Wiles, Creating engaging artificial characters for games, Proceedings of the second international conference on Entertainment computing, p.1-8, May 08-10, 2003, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
• 34: Marc Vass , John M. Carroll , Clifford A. Shaffer, Supporting creativity in problem solving environments, Proceedings of the 4th conference on Creativity & cognition, p.31-37, October 13-16, 2002, Loughborough, UK [doi>10.1145/581710.581717]
• 35: Peter Vorderer , Tilo Hartmann , Christoph Klimmt, Explaining the enjoyment of playing video games: the role of competition, Proceedings of the second international conference on Entertainment computing, p.1-9, May 08-10, 2003, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human factors

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Evaluation/methodology; User-centered design

  J. Computer Applications
  J.7 COMPUTERS IN OTHER SYSTEMS
      Subjects: Consumer products

General Terms:
Design, Experimentation, Human Factors, Performance

Keywords:
enjoyment, evaluation, flow, games