|
ABSTRACT
Sensor Networks need the ability to be dynamically programmed efficiently. Several frameworks have been developed for this purpose largely falling into one of three classes: i) user-guided code updates, ii) database model, and iii) agent-based model. Even though the agent-based model is being touted to bring increased efficiency in terms of energy consumed, its advantage has not been clearly articulated by the relevant sensor network literature. We identify a suitable application to showcase the advantages of autonomously mobile code and analyze the generic solutions offered by the three different classes of frameworks to show that indeed an agent-based approach can bring considerable energy savings for some application scenarios.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
P. Bonnet, J. Gehrke, and P. Seshadri, "Querying the Physical World", IEEE Personal Communications, Oct. 2000.
|
| |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
Athanassios Boulis , Chih-Chieh Han , Mani B. Srivastava, Design and implementation of a framework for efficient and programmable sensor networks, Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Mobile systems, applications and services, p.187-200, May 05-08, 2003, San Francisco, California
[doi> 10.1145/1066116.1066121]
|
| |
4
|
J. C. Chen, K. Yao, and R. E. Hudson "Source Localization and Beamforming" IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol.19, pp.30--39, March 2002.
|
| |
5
|
C. C. Han, R. Kumar, R. Shea, E. Kohler, and M. Srivastava, "A dynamic operating system for sensor nodes," Technical Report NESL-TM-2004-11-01, University of California Los Angeles, Networked Embedded Systems Lab, November 2004.
|
 |
6
|
John Heidemann , Fabio Silva , Chalermek Intanagonwiwat , Ramesh Govindan , Deborah Estrin , Deepak Ganesan, Building efficient wireless sensor networks with low-level naming, Proceedings of the eighteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles, October 21-24, 2001, Banff, Alberta, Canada
|
 |
7
|
Jason Hill , Robert Szewczyk , Alec Woo , Seth Hollar , David Culler , Kristofer Pister, System architecture directions for networked sensors, Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems, p.93-104, November 2000, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
|
 |
8
|
Chalermek Intanagonwiwat , Ramesh Govindan , Deborah Estrin, Directed diffusion: a scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks, Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, p.56-67, August 06-11, 2000, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
[doi> 10.1145/345910.345920]
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
Joshua Lifton , Deva Seetharam , Michael Broxton , Joseph A. Paradiso, Pushpin Computing System Overview: A Platform for Distributed, Embedded, Ubiquitous Sensor Networks, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Pervasive Computing, p.139-151, August 26-28, 2002
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
 |
13
|
|
|