ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The expected value of random minimal length spanning tree of a complete graph
Full text PdfPdf (365 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the sixteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms table of contents
Vancouver, British Columbia
SESSION: Session 8A table of contents
Pages: 700 - 704  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:0-89871-585-7
Author
David Gamarnik  IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
: SIAM Activity Group on Discrete Mathematics
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 22,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

We consider the number c(n, m) of connected labeled graphs on n nodes and m edges and the intimately related object, the expected length of the minimal spanning tree of a complete graphs with random edge lengths. We use a very simple recursive procedure for computing the values of c(n, m) for computing the expected length of the minimal spanning tree exactly, under the uniform and the exponential distributions. Our computations are recursive, scale very well with the size of the problem, and we provide the values of the expected minimal length spanning trees for complete graphs Kn with sizes n ≤ 45, extending recent results of Steele [Ste02], and Fill and Steele [FS04]. The main proof technique is based on introducing an artificial root to a graph and subsequently using a very simple inductive argument.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
{AB92} F. Avram and D. Bertsimas, The minimum spanning tree constant in geometric probability and under the independent model: a unified approach, The Annals of Applied Probability 2 (1992), 113--130.
 
2
{BCM90} E. Bender, E. Canfield, and B. McKay, The asymptotic number of labeled connected graphs with a given number of vertices and edges, Random structures and algorithms 1 (1990), no. 2, 127--169.
 
3
{COMS04} A. Coja-Oghlan, C. Moore, and V. Sanwalani, Counting connected graphs and hypergraphs via the probabilistic method, Proceedings of RANDOM, 2004.
 
4
{Fri85} A. Frieze, On the value of a random minimum spanning tree problem, Discrete Appl. Math. 10 (1985), 47--56.
 
5
{FS04} J. Fill and M. Steele, Exact expectations of minimal spanning trees for graphs with random edge weights.
 
6
{GS96} I. Gessel and B. Sagan, The Tutte polynomial of a graph, depth-first search, and simplicial complex partitions, Electronic J. Combinatorics, Foata Festschrift 3 (1996), no. 2, R9.
 
7
{HP73} F. Harary and E. M. Palmer, Graphical enumeration, Academic Press, 1973.
 
8
{Luc90} T. Luczak, On the number of sparse connected graphs, Random Structures and Algorithms 1 (1990), no. 2, 171--174.
 
9
 
10
{Ste02} J. M. Steele, On Minimal spanning trees for graphs with random edge lenghts, Mathematics and Computer Science II. Algorithms, Trees, Combinatorics and Probabilities, B. Chauvin, Ph. Flajolet, D. Gardy, and A. Mokkadem (eds.), Birkhäuser, Boston, 2002, pp. 223--245.