ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Is negative selection appropriate for anomaly detection?
Full text PdfPdf (307 KB)
Source Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Washington DC, USA
SESSION: Artificial immune systems table of contents
Pages: 321 - 328  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-010-8
Authors
Thomas Stibor  Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, Germany
Philipp Mohr  University of Kent
Jonathan Timmis  University of Kent
Claudia Eckert  Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, Germany
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 94,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1068009.1068061
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Negative selection algorithms for hamming and real-valued shape-spaces are reviewed. Problems are identified with the use of these shape-spaces, and the negative selection algorithm in general, when applied to anomaly detection. A straightforward self detector classification principle is proposed and its classification performance is compared to a real-valued negative selection algorithm and to a one-class support vector machine. Earlier work suggests that real-value negative selection requires a single class to learn from. The investigations presented in this paper reveal, however, that when applied to anomaly detection, the real-valued negative selection and self detector classification techniques require positive and negative examples to achieve a high classification accuracy. Whereas, one-class SVMs only require examples from a single class.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Ayara, J. Timmis, L. de Lemos, R. de Castro, and R. Duncan. Negative selection: How to generate detectors. In 1st Int. Conf. on Artificial Immune Systems, pages 89--98, September 2002.
 
2
 
3
C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. LIBSVM: a Library for Support Vector Machines (http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/papers/libsvm.pdf), December 2004.
 
4
D. Dasgupta, S. Forrest. Novelty Detection in Time Series Data Using Ideas from Immunology. In Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Systems. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1996.
 
5
D. G. Osmond. The turn-over of B-cell populations. Immunology Today, 14(1):34--37, 1993.
 
6
 
7
 
8
Elad Yom-Tov. An Introduction to Pattern Classification. In Advanced Lectures on Machine Learning, volume 3176 of LNCS, pages 1--20. Springer-Verlag, 2004.
 
9
F. Esponda, S. Forrest, and P. Helman. A formal framework for positive and negative detection schemes. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part B: Cybernetics, 34(1):357--373, 2004.
 
10
T. Fawcett. ROC graphs: Notes and practical considerations for data mining researchers. Technical Report HPL-2003-4, Hewlett Packard Laboratories, Jan. 17 2003.
 
11
A. Freitas and J. Timmis. Revisiting the Foundations of Artificial Immune Systems: A Problem Oriented Perspective. In Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. on Artificial Immune Systems, volume 2787 of LNCS, pages 229--241. Springer, September 2003.
 
12
F. González, D. Dasgupta, and G. Gomez. The effect of binary matching rules in negative selection. In Genetic and Evolutionary Computation -- GECCO-2003, volume 2723 of LNCS, pages 195--206, Chicago, 12-16 July 2003. Springer-Verlag.
 
13
F. González, D. Dasgupta, and R. Kozma. Combining negative selection and classification techniques for anomaly detection. In Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pages 705--710. IEEE, May 2002.
 
14
F. A. González, D. Dasgupta, and L. F. Niño. A Randomized Real-Valued Negative Selection Algorithm. In Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. on Artificial Immune Systems (ICARIS), volume 2787 of LNCS, pages 261--272, Edinburgh, UK, 2003. Springer-Verlag.
 
15
S. A. Hofmeyer. An Interpretative Introduction to the Immune System, 2000.
 
16
C.-W. Hsu, C.-C. Chang, and C.-J. Lin. A Pratical Guide to Support Vector Classification (http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/papers/guide/guide.pdf), July 2003.
 
17
C. A. Janeway, P. Travers, M. Walport, and M. Shlomchik. Immunologie. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, 2002.
 
18
Z. Ji and D. Dasgupta. Real-valued negative selection algorithm with variable-sized detectors. In Genetic and Evolutionary Computation -- GECCO-2004, Part I, volume 3102 of LNCS, pages 287--298, Seattle, WA, USA, 26-30 June 2004. Springer-Verlag.
 
19
K.-R. Müller, S. Mika, G. Ratsch, K. Tsuda, and B. Schölkopf. An Introduction to Kernel-Based Learning Algorithms. Transactions on Neural Networks, 12(2):181--201, 2001.
 
20
J. K. Percus, O. E. Percus, and A. S. Perelson. Predicting the Size of the T-Cell Receptor and Antibody Combining Region from Consideration of Efficient Self-Nonself Discrimination. Proc. of National Academy of Sciences USA, 90:1691--1695, 1993.
 
21
A. S. Perelson and G. Oster. Theoretical studies of clonal selection: minimal antibody repertoire size and reliability of self-nonself discrimination. In J. Theor. Biol., volume 81, pages 645--670, 1979.
 
22
 
23
B. Schölkopf. Statistical learning and kernel methods. Technical Report MSR-TR-2000-23, Microsoft Research (MSR), Feb. 2000.
 
24
B. Schölkopf, J. C. Platt, S.-T. Shawe-Taylor, A. J. Smola, and W. Williamson. Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution. Technical Report MSR-TR-99-87, Microsoft Research (MSR), Nov. 1999.
 
25
A. Secker, A. A. Freitas, and J. Timmis. AISEC: An artificial immune system for e-mail classification. In Proc. of the 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation CEC2003, pages 131--138, Canberra, 8-12 Dec. 2003. IEEE Press.
 
26
T. Stibor, K. M. Bayarou, and C. Eckert. An investigation of R-chunk detector generation on higher alphabets. In Genetic and Evolutionary Computation -- GECCO-2004, Part I, volume 3102 of LNCS, pages 299--307, Seattle, WA, USA, 26-30 June 2004. Springer-Verlag.
 
27
P. Vlachos. StatLib. http://lib.stat.cmu.edu.
 
28
A. Watkins and L. Boggess. A new classifier based on resource limited artificial immune systems. In Proc. of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation CEC2002, pages 1546--1551. IEEE Press, 2002.

CITED BY  10
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Thomas Stibor: colleagues
Philipp Mohr: colleagues
Jonathan Timmis: colleagues
Claudia Eckert: colleagues