ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the average case performance of some greedy approximation algorithms for the uncapacitated facility location problem
Full text PdfPdf (224 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Baltimore, MD, USA
SESSION: Session 9B table of contents
Pages: 441 - 449  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-58113-960-8
Authors
Abraham D. Flaxman  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Alan M. Frieze  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Juan C. Vera  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 22,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1060590.1060656
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In combinatorial optimization, a popular approach toNP-hard problems is the design of approximation algorithms. These algorithms typically run in polynomial time and are guaranteed to produce a solution which is within a known multiplicative factor of optimal. Unfortunately, the known factor is often known to be large in pathological instances. Conventional wisdom holds that, in practice, approximation algorithms will produce solutions closer to optimal than their proven guarantees. In this paper, we use the rigorous-analysis-of-heuristics framework to investigate this conventional wisdom.We analyze the performance of 3 related approximation algorithms for the uncapacitated facility location problem (from [Jain, Mahdian, Markakis, Saberi, Vazirani, 2003] and [Mahdian, Ye, Zhang, 2002]) when each is applied to an instances created by placing n points uniformly at random in the unit square. We find that, with high probability, these 3 algorithms do not find asymptotically optimal solutions, and, also with high probability, a simple plane partitioning heuristic does find an asymptotically optimal solution.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
F. Barahona and F. A. Chudak, Solving large scale uncapacitated facility location problems, in Approximation and Complexity in Numerical Optimization: Continuous and Discrete Problems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, (1999).
 
3
 
4
 
5
G. Cornuéjols, G. L. Nemhauser and L. A. Wolsey, The Uncapacitated Facility Location Problem, Discrete Location Theory, (1990).
 
6
M. Hoefer. Experimental comparison of heuristic and approximation algorithms for uncapacitated facility location. Proc. 2nd Intl. Workshop on Experimental and Efficient Algorithms (WEA 2003), LNCS 2647, (2003) 165--178.
7
 
8
 
9
J. Krarup and P. M. Pruzan, The simple plant location problem: Survey and synthesis,European Journal of Operational Research 12 (1983) 36--81.
 
10
 
11
 
12
M. Penrose, Random Geometric Graphs, Oxford University Press, (2003).
13
 
14
J. M. Steele, Probability Theory and Combinatorial Optimization CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics -- Volume 69, SIAM, (1997).
 
15
 
16
J. E. Yukich, Probability Theory of Classical Euclidean Optimization Problems, Springer-Verlag, (1998).

Collaborative Colleagues:
Abraham D. Flaxman: colleagues
Alan M. Frieze: colleagues
Juan C. Vera: colleagues