A knowledge-centric framework for process redesign

ABSTRACT

Research in the area of business process redesign has traditionally focused on performance metrics for measuring process change. However, from the perspective of an employee performing the business process, such measurements are inadequate because they fail to account for the knowledge change required for the employee to perform the new process. This paper explores process redesign from a knowledge perspective. We introduce the concept of a knowledge gap when a process is redesigned and, using theories of learning transfer, identify several process knowledge elements. A framework incorporating these knowledge elements can be used to assess knowledge change during process redesign. We illustrate the use of this framework in a case study, the process redesign at Campus Health department of a large public university.

REFERENCES

• 1: Anderson, J.R. Rules of the Mind. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, HIllsdale, NJ, 1993.
• 2: Arthur, W., Bennet, W., Stanush, P.L. and McNelly, T.L. Factors that influence skill decay and retention: a quantitative review and analysis. Human Performance, 11. 79--86.
• 3: Baldwin, T.T. and Ford, J.K. Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41. 63--105.
• 4: Bashein, B.J., Markus, M.L. and Riley, P. Preconditions for BPR success and how to prevent failures. Information Systems Management, 11 (2). 7--13.
• 5: Abraham Bernstein , Mark Klein , Thomas W. Malone, The process recombinator: a tool for generating new business process ideas, Proceeding of the 20th international conference on Information Systems, p.178-192, December 12-15, 1999, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
• 6: Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L. and Cocking, R.R. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academies Press, 2000.
• 7: Brinkerhoff, R.O. and Montesino, M.U. Partnership for Training Transfer: Lessons from a Corporate Study. Human Resources Development Quarterly, 6. 263--274.
• 8: J. Raymond Caron , Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa , Donna B. Stoddard, Business reengineering at CIGNA Corporation: experiences and lessons learned from the first five years, MIS Quarterly, v.18 n.3, p.233-250, Sept. 1994 [doi>10.2307/249617]
• 9: Chen, M. BRR Methodologies: Methods and Tools. in Elzinga, D.J., Gulledge, T.R. and Lee, C.-Y. eds. Business Process Engineering: Advancing the State of the Art, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, 1999, 187--212.
• 10: Injun Choi , Minseok Song , Chulsoon Park , Namkyu Park, An XML-based process definition language for integrated process management, Computers in Industry, v.50 n.1, p.85-102, January 2003 [doi>10.1016/S0166-3615(02)00139-2]
• 11: Thomas H. Davenport, Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1993
• 12: Earl, M.J. The new and the old of business process redesign. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 3 (1). 5--22.
• 13: Earl, M.J., Sampler, J.L. and Short, J.E. Strategies for Business Process Reengineering: Evidence from Field Studies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12 (1). 31--56.
• 14: Facteau, J.D., Dobbins, G.H., Russel, J.E.A., Ladd, R.T. and Kudisch, J.D. The influence of general perceptions for the training environment on pretraining motivation and perceived training transfer. Journal of Management, 21. 1--25.
• 15: Ford, J.K., Quinones, M.A., Sego, D.J. and Sorra, J.S. Factors affecting the opportunity to perform trained tasks on the job. Personnel Psychology, 45. 511--527.
• 16: Giaglis, G.M. A Taxonomy of Business Process Modeling and Information Systems Modeling Techniques. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 13. 209--228.
• 17: Gore, R. and Wong-On-Wing, B. The acquisition and transfer of tax skills. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 20 (2). 117.
• 18: Grover, V. From business reengineering to business process change management: a longitudinal study of trends and practices. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 46 (1). 36--46.
• 19: Grover, V., Jeong, S.R., Kettinger, W.J. and Teng, J.T.C. The Implementation of Business Process Reengineering. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12 (1). 109--144.
• 20: Hall, G., Rosenthal, J. and Wade, J. How to Make Re-engineering Work. Harvard Business Review, 71 (6). 119--131.
• 21: Hammer, M. and Champy, J. Re-engineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. Harper Business, New York, 1993.
• 22: Harmon, P. Business Process Change. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 2003.
• 23: Jia, X.-L., Xu, J.-X., Zhang, Z.-M. and Huang, N.-K., The research on representation and processing of process knowledge based on object-oriented modeling. in Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2003 International Conference on, (2003), 657--660 Vol.652.
• 24: Gary Katzenstein , F. Javier Lerch, Beneath the surface of organizational processes: a social representation framework for business process redesign, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.18 n.4, p.383-422, Oct. 2000 [doi>10.1145/358108.358111]
• 25: Kettinger, W.J. and Grover, V. Special Section: Toward a Theory of Business Process Change Management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12 (1). 9--30.
• 26: King, W.R. Process Reengineering: The Strategic Dimensions. Information Systems Management, 11 (2). 71--73.
• 27: Kraiger, K., Salas, E. and Cannon-Bowers, J.A. Measuring knowledge organization as a method for assessing learning during training. Human Factors, 37 (4). 804--816.
• 28: Leddo, J. and Abelson, R.P. The Nature of Explanations. in Galambos, J.A., Abelson, R.P. and Black, J.B. eds. Knowledge Structures, LEA, Hillsdale, NJ, 1986.
• 29: Thomas W. Malone , Kevin Crowston , George A. Herman, Organizing Business Knowledge: The MIT Process Handbook, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003
• 30: Palmer, J. The Human Organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1 (4). 294--307.
• 31: Giorgos Papavassiliou , Spyridon Ntioudis , Gregoris Mentzas , Andreas Abecker, Business Process Knowledge Modelling: Method and Tool, Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, p.138-142, September 02-06, 2002
• 32: Quinones, M.A. Pretraining context effects: Training assignment as feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80 (226--238).
• 33: Quinones, M.A. and Ehrenstein, A. Training for a Rapidly Changing Workplace: Applications of Psychological Research. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 1997.
• 34: Balasubramaiam Ramaesh , Vasant Dhar, Representing and Maintaining Process Knowledge for Large-Scale Systems Development, IEEE Expert: Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, v.9 n.2, p.54-59, April 1994 [doi>10.1109/64.294137]
• 35: Balasubramaniam Ramesh, Process Knowledge Management with Traceability, IEEE Software, v.19 n.3, p.50-52, May 2002 [doi>10.1109/MS.2002.1003454]
• 36: Roy, M.-C., Roy, K. and Bouchard, L. Human factors in business process re-engineering. Human Systems Management, 17 (3). 193--204.
• 37: Scheer, A.-W. and Allweyer, T. From reengineering to continuous process adaptation. in Elzinga, D.J., Gulledge, T.R. and Lee, C.-Y. eds. Business Process Engineering: Advancing the State of the Art, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, 1999, 1--24.
• 38: B. Scholz-Reiter , Ebrehard Stickel, Business Process Modelling, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, 1996
• 39: Mark K. Singley , John R. Anderson, The transfer of cognitive skill, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1989
• 40: Smith-Jentsch, K.A., Jentsch, F.G., Payne, S.C. and Salas, E. Can pretraining experiences explain individual differences in learning? Journal of Applied Psychology, 49. 110--116.
• 41: Robert De Souza , Zhao Zhen Ying , Liu Chao Yang, Modelling business processes and enterprise activities at the knowledge level, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, v.12 n.1, p.29-42, January 1998 [doi>10.1017/S0890060498121108]
• 42: K. Surysekar , B. Ramesh, On Managerial Incentives for Process Knowledge Capture and Use, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences ( HICSS-34)-Volume 3, p.3043, January 03-06, 2001
• 43: Thorndike, E.L. and Woodworth, R.S. The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. Psychological Review, 8. 247--261.
• 44: Tracey, J.B., Tannenbaum, S.I. and Kavanagh, M.J. Applying trained skills on the job: the importance of the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80. 239--252.
• 45: Tuggle, F.D. and Goldfinger, W.E. A methodology for mining embedded knowledge from process maps. Human Systems Management, 23 (1). 1--13.
• 46: Jurgen Vanhoenacker , Antony Bryant , Guido Dedene, Creating a knowledge management architecture for business process change, Proceedings of the 1999 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research, p.231-241, April 08-10, 1999, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States [doi>10.1145/299513.299690]
• 47: Watson, R.T. REVIEW: KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS AND RESEARCH ISSUES. MIS Quarterly, MIS Quarterly & The Society for Information Mgt., 2001, xv.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.m Miscellaneous

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Management, Measurement, Performance

Keywords:
business process change, knowledge change, knowledge management, learning transfer, training