|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we describe a method to independently audit a physical design to identify inefficiencies detrimental to high quality routing. The method provides an exhaustive review of netlist structures having many possible equivalent solutions, such as buffer trees, as well as other structures with flexibility of implementation. In addition, the method provides a means to quantify the inefficiency, in terms of routing length and the impact to routing congestion. Lastly, the method gives physical design engineers a framework to quickly identify causes of routing congestion and identify structures that can be acted upon to enhance routing. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
Additional Classification:
General Terms:
Keywords:
Collaborative Colleagues:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||