ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Expert systems development: some issues of design process
Full text PdfPdf (258 KB)
Source ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes archive
Volume 30 ,  Issue 2  (March 2005) table of contents
SECTION: Article abstracts with full text online table of contents
Pages: 1 - 5  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:0163-5948
Author
Mehdi Sagheb-Tehrani  Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 93,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1050849.1050864
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A discussion is presented of why some Expert Systems (ES) that organizations have developed are not successful. The concept of design process plays a very significant role in the outset of the Expert Systems Development (ESD) process. This concept has not been the subject of much debate and attention in ESD. From the authors' point of view, one of the main issues is how the designer (knowledge Engineer) thinks about the design process. In general, the designers' process is influenced by the knowledge engineer's conception. This paper endeavors to disclose some of the main factors related to knowledge engineer's conception of design process and an attempt is made to put forward a conceptual model of the expert systems' design process. This conceptual model is an initial step towards a successful implementation of ES projects.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Award E. M. (2003): Building Knowledge Automation Expert Systems with Exsys CORVID, EXSYS Inc., U.S.A.
 
3
 
4
 
5
Burrell G., Morgan G. (1979): Social Paradigms and Organization Analysis, Heineman, U.S.A.
 
6
 
7
Churchman C. W. (1979): The System Approach and Its Enemies, Basic Books, U.S.A.
 
8
Committee on Information Systems Trustworthiness, National Research Council (1999): Trust in Cyberspace, Washington DC, National Academy Press.
 
9
Constantine L. L., Yourdon E. (1979): Structured Design, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
 
10
 
11
Guimaraes T. (1999): "Empirically Testing the Relationship between End-User Computing Problems and Information Center Success Factors", Decision Sciences, Spring.
 
12
 
13
Jackson M. A. (1983): System Development, London, Prentice-Hall.
 
14
Jones J. C. (1980): Design Methods Seeds of Human Futures, John Wiley & Sons, U.K.
 
15
Jackson P. (1999): Introduction to Expert Systems, 3rd ed., Addison-Wesley, England.
 
16
 
17
 
18
Lawson B. (1986): How Designer Think, The Architectural Press Ltd., U.K.
 
19
Markus M. Lynne, Keil M. (1994): "If We Build It, They Will Come: Designing Information Systems That People Want to Use", Sloan Management Review, Cambridge, summer, Vol.35, Iss. 4, pg. 11, 15 pgs.
 
20
 
21
 
22
Neuman W. L. (2003): Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 5th ed., Allyn & Bacon.
 
23
O'Brien James A. (2004): Management Information Systems, 6th ed., McGraw-Hill.
 
24
 
25
 
26
27
 
28
 
29
30
31
 
32
Sagheb-Tehrani M. (1991): "Knowledge Elicitation: Some Issues for Further Research and Practice", In Proceeding of The 3rd International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Skokie, U.S.A.
 
33
 
34
Simon H. A. (1982): The Science of the Artificial, the MIT Press.
 
35
 
36
U.S. Department of Commerce (2003): Bureau of Economic Analysis, National Income and Product Accounts, Table 5.2 and 5.8.
 
37
U.S. Department of Commerce (2002): Bureau of Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States, Table 588, and Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970, Vol. 1, Series D, pp. 182--232.
 
38
 
39
Wise J. A. (1985): Decisions in Design Analyzing and Aiding the Act of Synthesis, In Behavioral Decision Making, ed., by Wright G., Plenum, NY.
 
40

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mehdi Sagheb-Tehrani: colleagues