ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Asynchronous collaborative writing through annotations
Full text PdfPdf (260 KB)
Source Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work table of contents
Chicago, Illinois, USA
SESSION: Information sharing and access table of contents
Pages: 578 - 581  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-810-5
Authors
Chunhua Weng  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
John H. Gennari  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 108,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1031607.1031705
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Annotation is central to iterative reviewing and revising activities in asynchronous collaborative writing. Currently most digital annotation models and systems assume static context information and provide far less functionality than physical annotations. We extend prior annotation research by Marshall and Cadiz and design an activity-oriented annotation model to mimic the rich functionality of physical annotations for an enhanced collaborative writing process. In this model, we define an annotation life cycle and support annotation version control. We implement a collaborative writing system that supports improved in-situ communication and cross-role feedback based on our annotation model.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Brickley, D., Guha, R. (2004). Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification 1.0. W3C recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium.
 
2
3
 
4
Campbell, D.G. (2002). The Use of the Dublin Core in Web Annotation Programs. in Int. Conf. on Dublin Core and Metadata for e-Communities 2002.
 
5
Farkas, D.K., Poltrock, S.E. (1995).Online editing, mark-up models, and the workplace lives of editors and writers. Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on, Volume: 38 (Issue: 2). 110--117.
 
6
Gennari, J.H., Weng, C., McDonald, D.W. (2004). An Ethnographic Study of Collaborative Clinical Trial Protocol Writing. Proc of MedInfo'04, San Francisco, CA. (in press).
 
7
Grudin, J., Bargeron, D. (2004). Communication and Collaboration Support Systems. in K. Okada, T.H., and T. Inoue (Eds.) ed., Ohmsha. (in press).
8
 
9
Weng, C., Gennari, J.H., McDonald, DW. (2004). A Collaborative Clinical Trial Protocol Writing System. Proc of MedInfo'2004, San Francisco, CA. (in press).

CITED BY  8
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Chunhua Weng: colleagues
John H. Gennari: colleagues