ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Simulation of large scale networks I: modelling differentiated services in conservative PDES
Full text PdfPdf (157 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 35th conference on Winter simulation: driving innovation table of contents
New Orleans, Louisiana
SESSION: Modeling methodology a table of contents
Pages: 658 - 666  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:0-7803-8132-7
Authors
Roger Curry  University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Rob Simmonds  University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Brian Unger  University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Sponsors
INFORMS/CS : Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences/College on Simulation
NIST : National Institute of Standards and Technology
IEEE/SMCS : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
(SCS) : The Society for Modeling and Simulation International
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
IEEE/CS : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Computer Society
ASA : American Statistical Association
Publisher
Winter Simulation Conference 
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 12,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

This paper explains how DiffServ has been implemented in an IP network simulator using an asynchronous conservative parallel discrete event simulation (PDES) kernel. DiffServ provides Quality of Service (QoS) functionality for IP networks and is designed to provide greater scalability and lower overhead than previous IP based QoS schemes. The paper explains the DiffServ components that have been implemented, focusing on the implementation of the preemptive network buffers required to provide DiffServ functionality. Certain optimisations possible for non-preemptive network buffers are not possible here. The paper explores which will work in the preemptive case. In particular, exploiting lookahead is more difficult leading to reduced performance in some cases. Optimisation schemes are described for two different preemptive buffering strategies and performance results demonstrating the costs of using these buffers are presented.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Blake, S., D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, and W. Weiss. 1998. RFC 2475 - An Architecture for Differentiated Services.
 
2
3
 
4
Cisco Systems. 2002. Internet Operating System Release 12.2. Configuration and Command References. Available online via <http://www.cisco.com/> {accessed March 29, 2003}.
 
5
Heinanen, J., F. Baker, W. Weiss, and J. Wroclawski. 1999. RFC 2597 - Assured Forwarding PHB Group.
 
6
Jacobsen, V., K. Nichols, and K. Poduri. 1999. RFC 2598 - An Expedited Forwarding PHB.
 
7
 
8
Nichols K., S. Blake, F. Baker, and D. Black. 1998. RFC 2474 - Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers.
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
Williamson, C., and Q. Wu. 2002. A Case for Context-Aware TCP/IP. ACM Performance Review 5 (1):11--23.
 
15

Collaborative Colleagues:
Roger Curry: colleagues
Rob Simmonds: colleagues
Brian Unger: colleagues