ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
New simulation methodology for risk analysis: genetic programming with monte carlo simulation for option pricing
Full text PdfPdf (352 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 35th conference on Winter simulation: driving innovation table of contents
New Orleans, Louisiana
SESSION: Risk analysis table of contents
Pages: 285 - 292  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:0-7803-8132-7
Author
N. K. Chidambaran  Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ
Sponsors
INFORMS/CS : Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences/College on Simulation
NIST : National Institute of Standards and Technology
IEEE/SMCS : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
(SCS) : The Society for Modeling and Simulation International
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
IEEE/CS : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Computer Society
ASA : American Statistical Association
Publisher
Winter Simulation Conference 
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 56,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

I examine the role of programming parameters in determining the accuracy of Genetic Programming for option pricing. I use Monte Carlo simulations to generate stock and option price data needed to develop a Genetic Option Pricing Program. I simulate data for two different stock price processes - a Geometric Brownian process and a Jump-Diffusion process. In the jump-diffusion setting, I seed the Genetic Program with the Black-Scholes equation as a starting approximation. I find that population size, fitness criteria, and the ability to seed the program with known analytical equations, are important determinants of the efficiency of Genetic Programming.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Allen, F. and Karjalainen, R., 1999. "Using Genetic Algorithms to find technical trading rules," Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 51 (2).
 
2
Ball, C. A. and Torous, W. N., 1985. "On jumps in common stock prices and their impact on call option pricing." Journal of Finance, Vol. 40 (March).
 
3
Ballie R. and DeGennaro, R., 1990. "Stock returns and volatility." Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 25 (June).
 
4
Black, F. and Scholes, M., 1972. "The valuation of option contracts and a test of market efficiency." Journal of Finance, Vol. 27 (May).
 
5
Black, F. and Scholes, M., 1973. "The pricing of options and corporate liabilities." Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81.
 
6
Bollerslev T., 1986. "Generalized Autoregressive conditional Heteroskedasticity." Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 31 (April).
 
7
Chance, D. M., 1986. "Empirical tests of the pricing of index call options," Advances in Futures and Options Research, Vol. 1.
 
8
Chidambaran, N. K., 2003. Genetic Programming with Monte Carlo Simulation for Option Pricing, Unpublished Working Paper, Rutgers University.
 
9
Chidambaran, N. K., C. H. Jevons Lee, and Joaquin Trigueros, 1999. An Adaptive Evolutionary Approach to Option Pricing via Genetic Programming, in: Computational Finance -- Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference, editors: Y. S. Abu-Mostafa, B. LeBaron, A. W. Lo, and A. S. Weigend, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 
10
Chidambaran, N. K. and S. Figlewski, 1995. "Streamlining Monte Carlo Simulation with the Quasi-Analytic Method: Analysis of a Path-Dependent Option Strategy," Journal of Derivatives, Winter.
 
11
French, K. R., Schwert, G. W., and Stambaugh, R. F., 1987. "Expected stock returns and volatility." Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 19 (September).
 
12
Ho, T. H., 1996. "Finite automata play repeated prisoner's dilemma with information processing costs." Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 20 (January-March).
 
13
 
14
Hull, J., 1993. Options, Futures, and Other Derivative Securities, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
 
15
Hutchinson, J., Lo A., and Poggio, T., 1994. "A Nonparametric approach to the Pricing and Hedging of Derivative Securities Via Learning Networks," Journal of Finance, Vol. 49. (June).
 
16
Kim, D. and Kon, S. J., 1994. "Alternative models for the conditional heteroscedasticity of stock returns." The Journal of Business, Vol. 67 (October).
 
17
 
18
Lettau, M., 1997. "Explaining the facts with adaptive agents." Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 21.
 
19
Macbeth, J. D. and Merville, L. J., 1979. "An empirical estimation of the Black-Scholes call option pricing model." Journal of Finance, Vol. 34 (December).
 
20
Macbeth, J. D. and Merville, L. J., 1980. "Tests of the Black-Scholes and Cox call option valuation models" Journal of Finance, Vol. 35 (May).
 
21
Marimon, R., McGrattan, E., Sargent, T. J., 1990. "Money as a medium of exchange in an economy with artificially intelligent agents." Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 14.
 
22
Merton, R. C., 1976. "Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous." Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3 (January-March).
 
23
Neely, C., P. Weller, and R. Dittmar, 1997. "Is Technical Analysis in the Foreign Exchange Market Profitable? A Genetic Programming Approach," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 32(4), pp.405--426.
 
24
Rubinstein, M., 1985. "Nonparametric Tests of Alternative Option Pricing Models." Journal of Finance, Vol. 40 (June).
 
25
Rubinstein, M., 1997. "Implied Binomial Trees", Journal of Finance, Vol. 49.