ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Parallel and distributed simulation: fast cell level ATM network simulation
Full text PdfPdf (139 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 34th conference on Winter simulation: exploring new frontiers table of contents
San Diego, California
SESSION: Modeling methodology b table of contents
Pages: 712 - 719  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:0-7803-7615-3
Authors
Xiao Zhong-e  University of Calgary
Rob Simmonds  University of Calgary
Brian Unger  University of Calgary
John Cleary  University of Waikato
Sponsors
IEEE/CS : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Computer Society
ASA : American Statistical Association
IEEE/SMCS : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society
INFORMS/CS : Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences/College on Simulation
NIST : National Institute of Standards and Technology
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
(SCS) : The Society for Modeling and Simulation International
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
Publisher
Winter Simulation Conference 
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 9,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

This paper presents performance results for cell level ATM network simulations using both sequential and parallel discrete event simulation kernels. Five benchmarks are used to demonstrate the performance of the simulation kernels for different types of model. The results demonstrate that for the type of network models used in the benchmarks, the TasKit simulation kernel is able to outperform all of the other kernels tested both sequentially and in parallel. For one benchmark TasKit is shown to outperform a conventional sequential simulation kernel by a factor of 3. For the same benchmark TasKit is shown to outperform the best of the other parallel kernels tested by a factor of 6. The paper explains how this performance advantage is achieved and cautions that additional research into automatic model partitioning will be essential to make this technology accessible to the general simulation community.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Chandy K. M. and J. Misra. 1979. Distributed simulation: A case study in design and verification of distributed simulation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 5(5):440--452.
3
4
 
5
 
6
7
8
9
 
10
Xiao Z., and B. Unger. 1995. Report on warpkit - performance study and improvement. Technical Report Technical Report 98-628-19, Computer Science Department, University of Calgary.
 
11
Collaborative Colleagues:
Xiao Zhong-e: colleagues
Rob Simmonds: colleagues
Brian Unger: colleagues
John Cleary: colleagues