ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Calculation of confidence intervals for simulation output
Full text PdfPdf (154 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS) archive
Volume 14 ,  Issue 4  (October 2004) table of contents
Pages: 344 - 362  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISSN:1049-3301
Authors
R. C. H. Cheng  University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
W. Holland  Cass Business School, London, United Kingdom
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 46,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1029174.1029176
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This article is concerned with the calculation of confidence intervals for simulation output that is dependent on two sources of variability. One, referred to as <i>simulation variability</i>, arises from the use of random numbers in the simulation itself; and the other, referred to as <i>parameter variability</i>, arises when the input parameters are unknown and have to be estimated from observed data. Three approaches to the calculation of confidence intervals are presented--the traditional asymptotic normality theory approach, a bootstrap approach and a new method which produces a conservative approximation based on performing just two simulation runs at carefully selected parameter settings. It is demonstrated that the traditional and bootstrap approaches provide similar degrees of accuracy and that whilst the new method may sometimes be very conservative, it can be calculated in a small fraction of the computational time of the exact methods.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Apostol, T. M. 1974. Mathematical Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
2
 
3
Cheng, R. C. H. and Holland, W. 1997. Sensitivity of computer simulation experiments to errors in input data. J. Statist. Comput. Simul. 57, 219--241.
 
4
Cheng, R. C. H. and Holland, W. 1998. Two-point methods for assessing variability in simulation output. J. Statist. Comput. Simul. 60, 183--205.
 
5
Cox, D. R. and Hinkley, D. V. 1974. Theoretical Statistics. Chapman and Hall, London, England.
 
6
Davison, A. C. and Hinkley, D. V. 1997. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
 
7
Efron, B. 1982. The Jacknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics. SIAM.
 
8
Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. J. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York.
 
9
Kleinrock, L. 1976. Queueing Systems : Volume 2. Computer Applications. Wiley, New York.
 
10
L'Ecuyer, P. and Perron, G. 1994. On the convergence rates of IPA and FDC derivative estimators. Oper. Res. 42, 463--656.
 
11
Lütkepohl, H. 1993. Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
 
12
Rao, C. R. 1973. Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications. Wiley, New York.


Collaborative Colleagues:
R. C. H. Cheng: colleagues
W. Holland: colleagues