ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Experimental evaluation of wireless simulation assumptions
Full text PdfPdf (242 KB)
Source International Workshop on Modeling Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems archive
Proceedings of the 7th ACM international symposium on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems table of contents
Venice, Italy
SESSION: Simulation and experiments table of contents
Pages: 78 - 82  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-953-5
Authors
David Kotz  Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
Calvin Newport  Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
Robert S. Gray  Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
Jason Liu  Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO
Yougu Yuan  Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
Chip Elliott  BBN Systems and Technologies, Cambridge, MA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 36,   Downloads (12 Months): 251,   Citation Count: 42
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1023663.1023679
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

All analytical and simulation research on ad~hoc wireless networks must necessarily model radio propagation using simplifying assumptions. We provide a comprehensive review of six assumptions that are still part of many ad hoc network simulation studies, despite increasing awareness of the need to represent more realistic features, including hills, obstacles, link asymmetries, and unpredictable fading. We use an extensive set of measurements from a large outdoor routing experiment to demonstrate the weakness of these assumptions, and show how these assumptions cause simulation results to differ significantly from experimental results. We close with a series of recommendations for researchers, whether they develop protocols, analytic models, or simulators for ad~hoc wireless networks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
K. Fall and K. Varadhan. The ns Manual, April 14 2002. www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/ns-documentation.html.
 
2
 
3
D. Ganesan, B. Krishnamachari, A. Woo, D. Culler, D. Estrin, and S. Wicker. Complex behavior at scale: An experimental study of low-power wireless sensor networks. Technical Report UCLA/CSD-TR 02-0013, UCLA Computer Science, 2002.
4
 
5
J. Heidemann, N. Bulusu, J. Elson, C. Intanagonwiwat, K. chan Lan, Y. Xu, W. Ye, D. Estrin, and R. Govindan. Effects of detail in wireless network simulation. In Proceedings of the SCS Multiconference on Distributed Simulation, pages 3--11, Phoenix, Arizona, January 2001. Society for Computer Simulation.
 
6
D. Kotz, C. Newport, R. S. Gray, J. Liu, Y. Yuan, and C. Elliott. Experimental evaluation of wireless simulation assumptions. Technical Report TR2004-507, Dept. of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, June 2004.
 
7
8
9
 
10
K. Pawlikowski, H.-D. Jeong, and J.-S. Lee. On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks. IEEE Communications, 40(1):132--139, January 2002.
 
11
12
13

CITED BY  43
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
David Kotz: colleagues
Calvin Newport: colleagues
Robert S. Gray: colleagues
Jason Liu: colleagues
Yougu Yuan: colleagues
Chip Elliott: colleagues