ACM Portal
  Subscribe (Full Service)    Register (Limited Service, Free)    Login
  Search:   The ACM Digital Library   The Guide
  
ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Voice over IP versus voice over frame relay
Full text PdfPdf (125 KB)
Source International Journal of Network Management archive
Volume 14 ,  Issue 4  (July 2004) table of contents
Pages: 223 - 230  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISSN:1099-1190
Authors
Pauline P. Francis-Cobley  Computer Science Department, University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados
Adrian D. Coward  The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 32,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1002/nem.518

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a comparison of the voice-enabling features of the Internet protocol (IP) and frame relay (FR) networks. The discussion focuses on the issues that affect the quality of service of voice applications and the relative suitability of IP and FR for delivering voice applications. This independent assessment serves to assist network managers in decision-making regarding suitable packetized voice solutions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Michael A. Gallo , William M. Hancock, Computer communications and networking technologies, Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Pacific Grove, CA, 2002
 
2
2. Zhang L, Zheng L, Ngee KS. Effect of delay and delay jitter on voice/video over IP, Computer Communications 2002; 25: Issue 9, 863-873.
 
3
3. Biran, Gil, Voice over frame relay, IP and ATM, White Paper, RAD Data Communications Ltd. http://www.rad.com.
 
4
4. Rix A, et al. Perceptual evaluation of speech quality, the new ITU standard for end-to-end speech quality asssessment, Part I, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 2002; 50(10): 755-764.
 
5
5. Lin Y-J. et al. Performance study of VAT/RTP for s upporting VoIP, Proc. 6th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, July, 2002; 289-294.
 
6
6. Venkatesha P, et al. A simple mixing algorithm for VoIP conference, Proc. 6th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, July, 2002; 289-294.
 
7
7. MCK Communications Inc., VoIP Primer, a White Paper, http://www.mck.com.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.2 COMPUTER-COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
      C.2.1 Network Architecture and Design
          Subjects: Network communications

Additional Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.2 COMPUTER-COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
      C.2.0 General
          Subjects: Data communications
      C.2.1 Network Architecture and Design
          Subjects: Frame relay networks; Packet-switching networks
      C.2.2 Network Protocols

          Nouns: IP
      C.2.3 Network Operations
          Subjects: Network management


General Terms:
Algorithms, Experimentation, Performance, Reliability, Standardization


REVIEW

"Peter Soreanu : Reviewer"

Voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) and voice over frame relay (VOFR) technologies are analyzed and compared in this paper. After a succinct introduction of the relevant voice transmission related parameters, the authors present a short overview o  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Pauline P. Francis-Cobley: colleagues
Adrian D. Coward: colleagues

The ACM Portal is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. Copyright © 2009 ACM, Inc.
Terms of Usage   Privacy Policy   Code of Ethics   Contact Us

Useful downloads: Adobe Acrobat    QuickTime    Windows Media Player    Real Player