The effects of head-mounted display mechanics on distance judgments in virtual environments

ABSTRACT

In virtual environments that use head-mounted displays (HMD), distance judgments to targets on the ground are compressed, at least when indicated through visually-directed walking tasks. The same tasks performed in the real world yield veridical results over distances ranging from 2m to 25m. This paper describes experiments aimed at determining if mechanical aspects of HMDs such as mass and moments of inertia are responsible for the apparent distortion of distance. Our results indicate that the mechanical aspects of HMDs cannot explain the full magnitude of distance underestimation seen in HMD-based virtual environments, though they may account for a portion of the effect.

REFERENCES

• 1: Kevin Wayne Arthur , Frederick P. Brooks, Jr., Effects of field of view on performance with head-mounted displays, 2000
• 2: BEALL, A. C., AND LOOMIS, J. M. 1995. Absolute motion parallax weakly determines visual scale in real and virtual environments. In Proc. SPIE, vol. 2411, 288--297.
• 3: CREEM-REGEHR, S. H., WILLEMSEN, P., GOOCH, A. A., AND THOMPSON, W. B. 2003. The influence of restricted viewing conditions on egocentric distance perception: Implications for real and virtual environments. Tech. Rep. UUCS-03-016, University of Utah.
• 4: CUTTING, J. E., AND VISHTON, P. M. 1995. Perceiving layout and knowing distance: The integration, relative potency and contextual use of different information about depth. In Perception of Space and Motion, W. Epstein and S. Rogers, Eds. Academic Press, New York, 69--117.
• 5: DURGIN, F., FOX, L., LEWIS, J., AND WALLEY, K. 2002. Perceptuomotor adaptation: More than meets the eye. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society 7 (Nov.), 103. Abstract.
• 6: ELLIS, S. R., AND MENGES, B. M. 1997. Judgments of the distance to nearby virtual objects: Interaction of viewing conditions and accommodative demand. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, 452.
• 7: FUKUSIMA, S. S., DA SILVA, J. A., AND LOOMIS, J. M. 1997. Visual perception of egocentric distance as assessed by triangulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 23, 1, 86--100.
• 8: KNAPP, J. M., AND LOOMIS, J. M. in press. Limited field of view of head-mounted displays is not the cause of distance underestimation in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.
• 9: LAMPTON, D. R., MCDONALD, D. P., SINGER, M., AND BLISS, J. P. 1995. Distance estimation in virtual environments. In Human Factor and Ergonomics Society, 1268--1272.
• 10: LOOMIS, J. M., AND KNAPP, J. M. 2003. Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In Virtual and Adaptive Environments, L. J. Hettinger and M. W. Haas, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
• 11: LOOMIS, J. M., DA SILVA, J. A., FUJITA, N., AND FUKUSIMA, S. S. 1992. Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18, 906--921.
• 12: OOI, T. L., WU, B., AND HE, Z. J. 2001. Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon. Nature 414, 8, 197--200.
• 13: PHILBECK, J. W., LOOMIS, J. M., AND BEALL, A. C. 1997. Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action. Perception and Psychophysics 59, 4, 601--612.
• 14: RIESER, J. J., ASHMEAD, D. H., TAYLOR, C. R., AND YOUNGQUIST, G. A. 1990. Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. Perception 19, 675--689.
• 15: SURDICK, R. T., DAVIS, E. T., KING, R. A., AND HODGES, L. F. 1997. The perception of distance in simulated visual displays: A comparison of the effectiveness and accuracy of multiple depth cues across viewing distances. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, 5 (October), 513--531.
• 16: THOMPSON, W. B., WILLEMSEN, P., GOOCH, A. A., CREEM-REGEHR, S. H., LOOMIS, J. M., AND BEALL, A. C. in press. Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.
• 17: THOMSON, J. A. 1983. Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 9, 3, 427--443.
• 18: Peter Willemsen , Amy A. Gooch, Perceived Egocentric Distances in Real, Image-Based, and Traditional Virtual Environments, Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference 2002, p.275, March 24-28, 2002
• 19: WITMER, B. G., AND KLINE, P. B. 1998. Judging perceived and traversed distance in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7, 2 (April), 144--167.
• 20: WITMER, B. G., AND SADOWSKI, JR., W. J. 1998. Nonvisually guided locomotion to a previously viewed target in real and virtual environments. Human Factors 40, 478--488.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.7 Three-Dimensional Graphics and Realism
          Subjects: Virtual reality

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.1 Multimedia Information Systems
          Subjects: Artificial, augmented, and virtual realities

Keywords:
head-mounted displays, perception, virtual reality