ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Information retrieval using word senses: root sense tagging approach
Full text PdfPdf (168 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Sheffield, United Kingdom
SESSION: Disambiguation table of contents
Pages: 258 - 265  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-881-4
Authors
Sang-Bum Kim  Korea University, Seoul, Korea
Hee-Cheol Seo  Korea University, Seoul, Korea
Hae-Chang Rim  Korea University, Seoul, Korea
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 70,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1008992.1009038
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Information retrieval using word senses is emerging as a good research challenge on semantic information retrieval. In this paper, we propose a new method using word senses in information retrieval: root sense tagging method. This method assigns coarse-grained word senses defined in WordNet to query terms and document terms by unsupervised way using co-occurrence information constructed automatically. Our sense tagger is crude, but performs consistent disambiguation by considering only the single most informative word as evidence to disambiguate the target word. We also allow multiple-sense assignment to alleviate the problem caused by incorrect disambiguation.Experimental results on a large-scale TREC collection show that our approach to improve retrieval effectiveness is successful, while most of the previous work failed to improve performances even on small text collection. Our method also shows promising results when is combined with pseudo relevance feedback and state-of-the-art retrieval function such as BM25.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
S. C. Deerwester, S. T. Dumais, T. K. Landauer, G. W. Furnas, and R. A. Harshman. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society of Information Science 41(6):391--407, 1990.
2
 
3
4
 
5
 
6
S. E. Robertson and S. Walker. Okapi/keenbow at trec-8. In Proceedings of TREC-8, 8th Text Retrieval Conference pages 151--161, Gaithersburg, US, 2000.
 
7
8
 
9
H.Schutze and J. Pedersen. Information retrieval based on word senses. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval pages 161--175, 1995.
10
11
 
12
P. Wallis. Information retrieval based on paraphrase. In Proceedings of the 1st Pacific Association for Computational Linguistics Conference 1993.
 
13

CITED BY  7
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sang-Bum Kim: colleagues
Hee-Cheol Seo: colleagues
Hae-Chang Rim: colleagues