ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Multi-processor scheduling to minimize flow time with ε resource augmentation
Full text PdfPdf (207 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Chicago, IL, USA
SESSION: Session 10A table of contents
Pages: 363 - 372  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-852-0
Authors
Chandra Chekuri  Lucent Bell Labs, Murray Hill, NJ
Ashish Goel  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Sanjeev Khanna  University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Amit Kumar  Indian Inst. of Technology, New Delhi
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1007352.1007411
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We investigate the problem of online scheduling of jobs to minimize flow time and stretch on m identical machines. We consider the case where the algorithm is given either (1+ε)m machines or m machines of speed (1+ε), for arbitrarily small ε > 0. We show that simple randomized and deterministic load balancing algorithms, coupled with simple single machine scheduling strategies such as SRPT (shortest remaining processing time) and SJF (shortest job first), are O(poly(1/ε))-competitive for both flow time and stretch. These are the first results which prove constant factor competitive ratios for flow time or stretch with arbitrarily small resource augmentation. Both the randomized and the deterministic load balancing algorithms are non-migratory and do immediate dispatch of jobs.The randomized algorithm just allocates each incoming job to a random machine. Hence this algorithm is non-clairvoyant, and coupled with SETF (shortest elapsed time first), yields the first non-clairvoyant algorithm which is constant competitive for minimizing flow time with arbitrarily small resource augmentation. The deterministic algorithm that we analyze is due to Avrahami and Azar. For this algorithm, we show O(1/ε)-competitiveness for total flow time and stretch, and also for their Lp norms, for any fixed p ≥ 1.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
A. Avidor, Y. Azar and J. Sgall. Ancient and new algorithms for load balancing in the lp norm. Algorithmica, 29(3):422--441, 2001.
 
3
4
5
6
7
 
8
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
13
14
 
15
M. Crovella, R. Frangioso and M. Harchol-Balter. Connection scheduling in web servers. USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems, 1999.
 
16
17
18
 
19
 
20
21
 
22
B. Schroeder and M. Harchol-Balter. Web servers under overload : how scheduling can help. Proc. of 18th International Teletraffic Congress, 2003.

CITED BY  11
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Chandra Chekuri: colleagues
Ashish Goel: colleagues
Sanjeev Khanna: colleagues
Amit Kumar: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: